|
| |
CLAY
COUNTY
EQIP OVERVIEW
The
Clay
County
USDA
local work group (USDA-LWG) supports the locally led conservation effort in the
delivery of conservation programs. The USDA-LWG supports the process by
coordinating USDA programs with other federal, state, and local programs to work
independently and in combination, to provide an integrate solution addressing
natural resource concerns. The following is a brief overview of the
process as it relates to EQIP.
The USDA-LWG ensures that a conservation needs assessment is developed using
community stakeholders’ input. Utilizing the assessment the USDA-LWG
will identify resource concerns, recommend practices, payment rates, cost-share
levels and funding needs. The group assists in multi-county coordination
when resource concerns will be addressed across county boundaries. The
group will complete a comprehensive civil rights impact analysis documenting the
potential percentage of landowner/operator participation by race, gender and
national origin. The impact analysis documents any positive or negative
effects on socially disadvantaged program beneficiaries.
The above information is solicited by MS NRCS each year in a common format.
Following the submittals of local funding proposals, the State Conservationist
will convene the State Technical Committee to review funding requests and make
recommendations on ranking criteria, eligible practices and funding. Any
adopted recommendations to a county proposal will be returned to the county to
incorporate into the county’s final approval proposal.
As result of this process the following resource concerns have been approved for
Clay
County
for FY 2003. The county allocation will be distributed as indicated below.
|
Resource Concern
|
Percent of
County
Allocation
|
| Water Quality
– Sedimentation
|
35
|
|
Grazing Lands
|
50
|
| Sustainable Forestry
|
5
|
| Water Quality - Animal Waste
|
10
|
| Total
|
100%
|
For More Information:
1. Water Quality – Sedimentation (Ranking
sheet, Cost List, Eligible Practices)
2. Grazing Lands (Ranking sheet, Cost List,
Eligible Practices)
3. Sustainable Forestry (Ranking sheet, Cost
List, Eligible Practices)
4. Water Quality - Animal Waste (Ranking
sheet, Cost List, Eligible Practices)
| |
|